Red Government Fleet with star logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Public Sector FleetsDeveloping Service Level Agreements with Internal Customer Departments

The majority of public sector fleets do not employ service level agreements between the fleet department and internal customer departments. Although these types of agreements are relatively commonplace between commercial fleets and fleet service providers, only in the past 10 years have they begun to emerge in the public sector.

by Mike Antich
October 24, 2006
4 min to read


The majority of public sector fleets do not employ service level agreements between the fleet department and internal customer departments. Although these types of agreements are relatively commonplace between commercial fleets and fleet service providers, only in the past 10 years have they begun to emerge in the public sector. One reason for their emergence among government fleets was a response to the fleet privatization initiatives, in which outsourcing companies made firm performance and cost guarantees to public officials. Those fleets that do employ service level agreements, usually have multiple agreements with different user departments. Service level agreements are most commonly made with fire, solid waste, police, and public works or street maintenance departments.


Servicing the Squeaky Wheel
The first inclination is to initiate a service agreement with your largest customer. However, Jim Wright, president of Fleet Counselor Services, recommends starting with the “squeaky wheel” department. “It is usually not your largest customer, rather a small department complaining about high downtime or cost.”


The first step in implementing a service agreement is identifying end-user issues. “You need to document downtime, cost issues, and customer-perceived lack of performance,” said Wright.


Collecting this information over one completed financial period, typically a month, is recommended. “When collecting this information, always ask the customer department to provide documentation regarding such issues as high cost, poor performance, or higher-than-normal downtime. Ask them to sub-stantiate whatever they can in writing,” said Wright. Conduct a work order analysis to determine the validity of these issues. “More often then not, these allegations are valid,” added Wright.


Rather than reinventing the wheel, seek to acquire similar service agreements from other fleet managers, upon which you can model your agreement. Another alternative is to contact companies such as Fleet Counselor Services, which has a 13-page document that covers all service-related contingencies.


A service agreement is not a one-sided document. “For instance, a customer department may cite high downtime with snow equipment during snowstorms. However, a work order analysis may determine that 30 percent of the repairs performed during snow emergencies are caused by operator abuse,” said Wright. “Based on this information, a service agreement may require the customer department to provide operator training and internal certification on snow equipment.”


Service level agreements should be re-evaluated every budget preparation season. Service level agreements are living documents that evolve over time. “These agreements will change and vary by customer department, because they are driven each year by budget considerations,” said Wright. “In situations where disputes may arise, there also needs to be a binding arbitration clause incorporated in a service level agreement,” added Wright.


Three Mistakes Made by Fleet Managers
Three common mistakes are made in developing a service agreement. The first mistake is when the fleet manager over-promises to the customer department.


The second mistake is not involving your staff in developing service level agreements. A fleet manager should involve his or her staff in service level agreement negotiations throughout the entire process up to the creation of the final document. The fleet department team should be comprised of representatives from the shop floor, parts department supervisor, financial, and obviously the fleet operation management.


“Many service level agreements fail because the fleet manager didn’t involve the day-to-day supervisory management staff that has to meet these performance standards. Sometimes, downtime standards are guaranteed to the customer department that the shop simply can’t deliver,” said Wright.


The third pitfall is creating an issue out of a non-issue. If downtime is not an issue, don’t make it an issue. Don’t make it part of the service level agreement. “When developing a service level agreement, only address those areas where a deficit exists and there is need for improvement,” said Wright.


Benefits of Service Agreements
Are service level agreements worth the time and effort? According to Wright, the main benefits of a service agreement are:
1. It creates a professional business relationship with a customer department that will spread to other departments, such as finance and purchasing.
2. The customer department may not know the “rules of the game” and maybe too embarrassed to ask. By being up-front and open, you can start the communication on a positive note.
3. It assists in identifying cost and performance level prior to the beginning of a new fiscal year.


These are three sound reasons. Let me know if you agree.


mike.antich@bobit.com

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Blog Posts

My Remembrances of Ed Bobit

One of the highest compliments to someone in the auto industry is to say they have gasoline running through their veins. In Ed Bobit's case, he had "fleet" running through his veins.

Read More →

Fleet Is Not an Island Unto Itself

A successful fleet operation is not an island unto itself. Yet, this is how some fleet managers view their operation – an island surrounded by a sea of unreasonable user groups. We will all agree this is the wrong mindset and that fleet operations must be closely aligned with user departments. However, the reality is that interdepartmental friction is an unfortunate fact of life, especially territorial issues that result in emotional defiance not open to discussion or compromise.

Read More →

What is the Future of Public Sector Fleet Managers?

The implementation of chargeback systems started the evolution toward professional fleet managers. No longer was the best mechanic the automatic choice to be fleet manager. The trend toward privatization was another catalyst that accelerated the evolution of the fleet function because fleet managers realized that to survive, they needed knowledge and skills beyond vehicle maintenance. These, along with other catalysts, are causing the fleet management function to morph in a new direction.

Read More →
Ad Loading...

Proactive vs. Reactive Fleet Management

In today’s fiscal environment, fleet management can be more aptly described as a form of “crisis management.” More often than not, fleet decisions are driven by senior management’s knee-jerk reactions or by the never-ending need to put out fires. In this reality, it is easy to slip into a reactive fleet management style, managing the fleet from a tactical level, addressing day-to-day crisises with a knee-jerk management approach. However, in today’s environment, you can’t afford to be reactive.

Read More →

Is It Time to Create an Energy Manager Position?

Most OEMs believe it will require the use of a diversity of fuels to meet the 2016 and 2025 CAFE requirements. As a result, OEMs will need to develop a broader portfolio of vehicles, powered by a diversity of fuels. Will this fuel diversity necessitate the creation of an energy professional position? The State of Colorado thinks so.. My prediction is that in the near future, additional political subdivisions will follow the lead of the State of Colorado.

Read More →

Root Cause Analysis of Fleet’s Friction With User Departments

A best-in-class fleet operation has excellent interdepartmental relationships. However, this is getting harder to achieve in today’s fiscally constrained environment. Even in the best of times, interdepartmental friction is an unfortunate fact of life, but as a professional fleet manager, your job is to minimize it. Today, every department is looking to stretch scarce budget dollars, and this sometimes occurs at the expense of other departments with whom they interact.

Read More →
Ad Loading...

Are You an Administrator Or a Manager?

The greatest challenge facing the future of public-sector fleet management is how we define ourselves as a profession. Are we administrators of a fleet or are we managers? Do we manage our fleet from a tactical level, putting out the day-to-day fires – or a strategic level, focusing on achieving specific long-term objectives? In the future, I believe a strategic focus will be crucial to succeed in public-sector fleet management; otherwise, you will run the risk of being relegated to mediocrity.

Read More →

Thank God for Hard Times

Hard times present the opportunity (or necessity) to make needed changes in fleet management that would otherwise have never occurred during good times. Too often, change is difficult to implement in the government sector as the status quo reigns supreme. However, in an environment of dwindling resources and shrinking budgets, the “status quo model” no longer works. Business as usual is a recipe for disaster.

Read More →

The Impending Retirement Tsunami & Resulting Brain Drain

The demographics of public sector fleet operations are skewing increasingly to an aging workforce. A key reason is the large number of baby boomers eligible to retire now and into the next decade. Studies have documented the implications to various industries, but there has been little discussion about the ramifications to fleet management. Not only will there be a “retirement tsunami” in fleet, but there will be an even more crippling “brain drain” of lost institutional and legacy knowledge.

Read More →
Ad Loading...

Think You Run a Cost-Effective Fleet Operation? Prove It

You may think you manage a well-run fleet, but how do you really know unless you have objective data to prove it? When you know your "numbers," you substantially increase the likelihood of successfully presenting the fleet position to the user departments, policy makers, and politicians. In addition, metrics help educate user departments having a financially adverse impact on fleet operations, and bring these inefficient practices to the attention of management in a non-accusatory format.

Read More →