Red Government Fleet with star logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Public Sector Fleets:Focus on the Cause (the Driver), Not the Symptom (the Accident)

Reducing the number of preventable accidents presents a huge opportunity to reduce fleet costs. The industry average cost to repair a fleet vehicle involved in an accident is $1,848. Nowadays, even the simplest fender bender costs $500 or more. When other accident costs are included, such as loss of use, liability, workers’ comp, and other indirect expenses, the total cost exceeds $10,000 per incident.

by Mike Antich
April 10, 2007
4 min to read


Reducing the number of preventable accidents presents a huge opportunity to reduce fleet costs. The industry average cost to repair a fleet vehicle involved in an accident is $1,848. Nowadays, even the simplest fender bender costs $500 or more. When other accident costs are included, such as loss of use, liability, workers’ comp, and other indirect expenses, the total cost exceeds $10,000 per incident. In today’s fleet management world, few areas remain where such dramatic savings can be achieved simply by reducing the number of preventable accidents.


There are two cost components to fleet accidents. The first is the actual repair of the vehicle. The second is liability cost, which can run the gamut from tens of thousands of dollars to potentially millions in a high-profile incident. Government fleets are particularly vulnerable to these high-profile incidents. For instance, the City of Tampa was ordered March 30 to pay a nearly $18-million jury award to a man who collided with a city water department truck – the largest award ever against the city. The plaintiff’s attorney argued that the water department truck caused the crash by veering across three lanes of traffic. In another example, the City of Detroit, in two separate lawsuits, paid $5.5 million and $3.9 million for accidents involving water department vehicles.


Public Sector Fleet Accident Rates
No industry-wide statistics exist on the percentage of public sector vehicles annually involved in an accident. Therefore, it is difficult to identify the industry-wide percentage of preventable accidents. The reason for this paucity of data is that not all public sector fleets have systems in place to track accident types. In the absence of this data, it is necessary to use anecdotal, fleet-specific examples. When doing so, common factors emerge as to types of accidents experienced by public sector fleets. For instance, most fleet managers will tell you that public sector vehicles are hit more often than they hit other vehicles. Another common factor is that fleet managers will tell you that the majority of their accidents involve fleet vehicles hitting stationary objects. On average, public sector fleet vehicles, particularly those operated by municipalities, travel fewer than 10,000 miles per year. This makes them less vulnerable to accidents than their commercial fleet counterparts, which travel an average of 24,000 miles per year. On the other hand, municipal vehicles drive primarily in high-density urban traffic, increasing accident risk exposure. Although hard to quantify, every accident prevented represents dollars that go straight to the bottom line of your fleet budget.


Responsibility for fleet safety varies between political subdivisions. Driver safety may be the responsibility of the department supervisor, safety manager, or fleet manager. Regardless, a comprehensive fleet safety program should be in place to ensure all responsible individuals actively address driver safety and all are working from the same policy. There should be a strong safety program that is ongoing and not a once-a-year event.


According to Milton Reid, director of General Services for the City of Gainesville, Fla., fleet managers can implement a variety of programs to reduce preventable accidents:

  1. Develop and establish effective operator training programs to include incentives and penalties for safe and unsafe drivers.

  2. Standardize fleet, where possible, so users are familiar with vehicle/equipment operation.

  3. Establish and monitor a procedure whereby operators must do a “walk-around” check on vehicles before the beginning of each shift or work day.

  4. Develop specifications compatible with the vehicle and its application to allow for minimum blind spots by including the proper rear-view mirrors and cameras where needed.

  5. Prohibit hand-held cell phone use while driving.


Another city successfully implementing these strategies is Seattle. For the third straight year, the City of Seattle's claim and lawsuit settlement costs were down for accidents involving city vehicles. Officials credit the reduction in claims to improved driver safety programs implemented by City Light and Parks. All employees who drive as part of their jobs must take defensive driver training. The City of Seattle actively investigates all accidents, counsels and retrains employees involved in multiple accidents, obtains five-year driving records before making hiring decisions, and screens out drivers with bad driving records.


Focus on the Driver, Not the Asset
The goal of a driver risk management program is to prevent vehicles from colliding in the first place. In this vein, fleet managers need to view accidents from a different perspective than just repairing bent metal. The true cost savings are in accident prevention and not in accident repair cost reduction. To reduce accidents, fleet managers must focus on the cause (the driver) and not the symptom (the accident).


Let me know what you think. mike.antich@bobit.com

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Blog Posts

My Remembrances of Ed Bobit

One of the highest compliments to someone in the auto industry is to say they have gasoline running through their veins. In Ed Bobit's case, he had "fleet" running through his veins.

Read More →

Fleet Is Not an Island Unto Itself

A successful fleet operation is not an island unto itself. Yet, this is how some fleet managers view their operation – an island surrounded by a sea of unreasonable user groups. We will all agree this is the wrong mindset and that fleet operations must be closely aligned with user departments. However, the reality is that interdepartmental friction is an unfortunate fact of life, especially territorial issues that result in emotional defiance not open to discussion or compromise.

Read More →

What is the Future of Public Sector Fleet Managers?

The implementation of chargeback systems started the evolution toward professional fleet managers. No longer was the best mechanic the automatic choice to be fleet manager. The trend toward privatization was another catalyst that accelerated the evolution of the fleet function because fleet managers realized that to survive, they needed knowledge and skills beyond vehicle maintenance. These, along with other catalysts, are causing the fleet management function to morph in a new direction.

Read More →
Ad Loading...

Proactive vs. Reactive Fleet Management

In today’s fiscal environment, fleet management can be more aptly described as a form of “crisis management.” More often than not, fleet decisions are driven by senior management’s knee-jerk reactions or by the never-ending need to put out fires. In this reality, it is easy to slip into a reactive fleet management style, managing the fleet from a tactical level, addressing day-to-day crisises with a knee-jerk management approach. However, in today’s environment, you can’t afford to be reactive.

Read More →

Is It Time to Create an Energy Manager Position?

Most OEMs believe it will require the use of a diversity of fuels to meet the 2016 and 2025 CAFE requirements. As a result, OEMs will need to develop a broader portfolio of vehicles, powered by a diversity of fuels. Will this fuel diversity necessitate the creation of an energy professional position? The State of Colorado thinks so.. My prediction is that in the near future, additional political subdivisions will follow the lead of the State of Colorado.

Read More →

Root Cause Analysis of Fleet’s Friction With User Departments

A best-in-class fleet operation has excellent interdepartmental relationships. However, this is getting harder to achieve in today’s fiscally constrained environment. Even in the best of times, interdepartmental friction is an unfortunate fact of life, but as a professional fleet manager, your job is to minimize it. Today, every department is looking to stretch scarce budget dollars, and this sometimes occurs at the expense of other departments with whom they interact.

Read More →
Ad Loading...

Are You an Administrator Or a Manager?

The greatest challenge facing the future of public-sector fleet management is how we define ourselves as a profession. Are we administrators of a fleet or are we managers? Do we manage our fleet from a tactical level, putting out the day-to-day fires – or a strategic level, focusing on achieving specific long-term objectives? In the future, I believe a strategic focus will be crucial to succeed in public-sector fleet management; otherwise, you will run the risk of being relegated to mediocrity.

Read More →

Thank God for Hard Times

Hard times present the opportunity (or necessity) to make needed changes in fleet management that would otherwise have never occurred during good times. Too often, change is difficult to implement in the government sector as the status quo reigns supreme. However, in an environment of dwindling resources and shrinking budgets, the “status quo model” no longer works. Business as usual is a recipe for disaster.

Read More →

The Impending Retirement Tsunami & Resulting Brain Drain

The demographics of public sector fleet operations are skewing increasingly to an aging workforce. A key reason is the large number of baby boomers eligible to retire now and into the next decade. Studies have documented the implications to various industries, but there has been little discussion about the ramifications to fleet management. Not only will there be a “retirement tsunami” in fleet, but there will be an even more crippling “brain drain” of lost institutional and legacy knowledge.

Read More →
Ad Loading...

Think You Run a Cost-Effective Fleet Operation? Prove It

You may think you manage a well-run fleet, but how do you really know unless you have objective data to prove it? When you know your "numbers," you substantially increase the likelihood of successfully presenting the fleet position to the user departments, policy makers, and politicians. In addition, metrics help educate user departments having a financially adverse impact on fleet operations, and bring these inefficient practices to the attention of management in a non-accusatory format.

Read More →