Red Government Fleet with star logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Uptick in Fuel-Related Problems in Diesel Trucks

The EPA mandated the use of ULSD, effective June 1, 2006. Since then, there has been an uptick in reports of fuel-related problems, such as corrosion in storage tanks and dispensing systems, onboard vehicle fuel tank corrosion, clogged filters, and seal and gasket deterioration. What has the industry scratching its "collective head" is the chronological correlation between the uptick in fuel-related problems and the introduction of ULSD. Is there a connection between the two?

Mike Antich
Mike AntichFormer Editor and Associate Publisher
Read Mike's Posts
July 28, 2010
5 min to read


By Mike Antich

The EPA mandated the introduction of ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD), effective June 1, 2006. Since then, there has been an uptick in reports of fuel-related problems. Recurring complaints are corrosion in storage tanks and dispensing systems containing ULSD, onboard vehicle fuel tank corrosion, clogged filters, and seal and gasket deterioration. "I've been around diesel equipment most of my life and clearly we have seen a significant spike in fuel-related issues within the past three to four years, including the identification of particles that appear to be pieces of rust in fuel samples, in addition to increased bacteria, microbes, and water," said J.J. Keig, CAFM, fleet manager for NCH EcoServices.

Similarly, some OEMs are reporting field issues with corrosion of steel fuel tanks on vehicles. "We don't know if it is related to ultra low sulfur diesel or not, but it has correlated with the introduction of ULSD," said one OEM engineer, who wished to remain anonymous. "Since ULSD came out, we have seen more of an issue with fuel tank corrosion and fuel filter clogging, but we don't know definitively if it is being caused by ULSD or by poor quality biodiesel. The fuel tank corrosion seems to occur more in the Southeast. We're not sure what's causing these issues, but we've definitely seen more in the last couple of years than before."

Possible Sources of Fuel-Related Problems

EPA standards require ultra low sulfur diesel to contain no more than 15 parts per million of sulfur. One consequence to the reduction of sulfur, according to some in the industry, is that it creates a more favorable environment for microbes and bacteria to develop and thrive. Two major groups of micro-organisms contaminate fuel systems - bacteria and fungi. Some fleet managers are concerned that ULSD may increase the incident of microbial contamination. These fleets report a higher degree of water contamination in storage tanks and vehicle tanks. Microbes depend on this water to live and the "food hydrocarbons" found in diesel fuel to proliferate. Few microbes actually proliferate in the fuel itself, but do depend on the hydrocarbons in diesel fuel for nutrition. Once the contamination process begins, it will quickly accelerate while the fuel is stored. Microbes will immediately start to grow in water, which will ultimately expand into a growing colony. The colony produces acids that corrode metal parts in the fuel tank and fuel systems. Another contributing factor to contaminated diesel has been the introduction of biodiesel. Some organic blends of biodiesel have been found to accelerate bacteria and microbe growth.

As bacteria and fungi reproduce, they form biomass, which accumulates at the fuel-water interface, on tank surfaces, and on filters. The development of biomass is a direct consequence of microbial growth, but its effect on fuel systems is mostly indirect. As the metabolic waste from the biomass and dead cells accumulate, they settle out as sludge at the bottom of a fuel tank. If not treated, the colony will grow very rapidly in a fuel storage tank and produce as much as several pounds of sludge per week. The sludge not only gums up the storage and dispensing tanks, but can also be transferred to the fuel tank of a vehicle. As a result, vehicle fuel filters may become clogged. The first symptom of this is reduced filter-life. Occasionally, there can be catastrophic failures, such as engine shutdown due to fuel starvation.

In most cases, contaminants are "imported" into a vehicle's fuel system. For instance, before ULSD fuel reaches the dispensing pump, it may be transferred from three to six storage tanks and/or trucks. At every point along the way, the fuel usually absorbs small amounts of water and contamination. Also, some companies do not "top off" their storage tanks and keep a minimum amount of fuel on hand. "The reduced fuel volume maximizes the surface area of the tanks to produce condensation," said Keig. "Another factor that contributes to both microbe growth and water accumulation is how fast fuel is run through storage and dispensing tanks. Generally, problems decrease with higher volume."

Once condensation and microbes become an issue, fleet managers must remediate (pump out tanks) and filter the fuel. "Once you have microbes, it is almost impossible to completely eliminate them," said Keig. "You must treat your storage tanks."

A variety of products and procedures are available to minimize the impact of microbial contamination. Of the 12 billion gallons of diesel consumed annually, less than 1 percent is treated with an antimicrobial agent, according to Dow Chemical.

Fuel Trade-Offs

ULSD is designed to decrease emissions and prevent sulfur damage to diesel particulate filters (DPF), which need to be cleaned of ash every 150,000 to 300,000 miles, depending on application. In pre-2007 engines, the ash was primarily created by oil additives needed to protect engine components from sulfuric acid. Since ULSD has only 15 parts per million of sulfur, it allows the use of CJ-4 engine oil, which doesn't contain these additives to protect against sulfuric acid, and, as a result, generates less ash and maximizes DPF cleaning intervals.

However, there are trade-offs. ULSD costs a few cents more per gallon and contains 1-2 percent less energy. The refining process that removes the sulfur also removes high-energy aromatics, which corresponds to a 1-2 percent increase in fuel consumption.

What has the industry scratching its "collective head" is the chronological correlation between the uptick in fuel-related problems in diesel trucks and the introduction of ULSD. Is there a connection between the two? Although highly controversial, some are asking: Is the increased incidents of microbial contamination and fuel tank corrosion unanticipated trade-offs in the use of ULSD?

Let me know what you think.

mike.antich@bobit.com

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Blog Posts

My Remembrances of Ed Bobit

One of the highest compliments to someone in the auto industry is to say they have gasoline running through their veins. In Ed Bobit's case, he had "fleet" running through his veins.

Read More →

Fleet Is Not an Island Unto Itself

A successful fleet operation is not an island unto itself. Yet, this is how some fleet managers view their operation – an island surrounded by a sea of unreasonable user groups. We will all agree this is the wrong mindset and that fleet operations must be closely aligned with user departments. However, the reality is that interdepartmental friction is an unfortunate fact of life, especially territorial issues that result in emotional defiance not open to discussion or compromise.

Read More →

What is the Future of Public Sector Fleet Managers?

The implementation of chargeback systems started the evolution toward professional fleet managers. No longer was the best mechanic the automatic choice to be fleet manager. The trend toward privatization was another catalyst that accelerated the evolution of the fleet function because fleet managers realized that to survive, they needed knowledge and skills beyond vehicle maintenance. These, along with other catalysts, are causing the fleet management function to morph in a new direction.

Read More →
Ad Loading...

Proactive vs. Reactive Fleet Management

In today’s fiscal environment, fleet management can be more aptly described as a form of “crisis management.” More often than not, fleet decisions are driven by senior management’s knee-jerk reactions or by the never-ending need to put out fires. In this reality, it is easy to slip into a reactive fleet management style, managing the fleet from a tactical level, addressing day-to-day crisises with a knee-jerk management approach. However, in today’s environment, you can’t afford to be reactive.

Read More →

Is It Time to Create an Energy Manager Position?

Most OEMs believe it will require the use of a diversity of fuels to meet the 2016 and 2025 CAFE requirements. As a result, OEMs will need to develop a broader portfolio of vehicles, powered by a diversity of fuels. Will this fuel diversity necessitate the creation of an energy professional position? The State of Colorado thinks so.. My prediction is that in the near future, additional political subdivisions will follow the lead of the State of Colorado.

Read More →

Root Cause Analysis of Fleet’s Friction With User Departments

A best-in-class fleet operation has excellent interdepartmental relationships. However, this is getting harder to achieve in today’s fiscally constrained environment. Even in the best of times, interdepartmental friction is an unfortunate fact of life, but as a professional fleet manager, your job is to minimize it. Today, every department is looking to stretch scarce budget dollars, and this sometimes occurs at the expense of other departments with whom they interact.

Read More →
Ad Loading...

Are You an Administrator Or a Manager?

The greatest challenge facing the future of public-sector fleet management is how we define ourselves as a profession. Are we administrators of a fleet or are we managers? Do we manage our fleet from a tactical level, putting out the day-to-day fires – or a strategic level, focusing on achieving specific long-term objectives? In the future, I believe a strategic focus will be crucial to succeed in public-sector fleet management; otherwise, you will run the risk of being relegated to mediocrity.

Read More →

Thank God for Hard Times

Hard times present the opportunity (or necessity) to make needed changes in fleet management that would otherwise have never occurred during good times. Too often, change is difficult to implement in the government sector as the status quo reigns supreme. However, in an environment of dwindling resources and shrinking budgets, the “status quo model” no longer works. Business as usual is a recipe for disaster.

Read More →

The Impending Retirement Tsunami & Resulting Brain Drain

The demographics of public sector fleet operations are skewing increasingly to an aging workforce. A key reason is the large number of baby boomers eligible to retire now and into the next decade. Studies have documented the implications to various industries, but there has been little discussion about the ramifications to fleet management. Not only will there be a “retirement tsunami” in fleet, but there will be an even more crippling “brain drain” of lost institutional and legacy knowledge.

Read More →
Ad Loading...

Think You Run a Cost-Effective Fleet Operation? Prove It

You may think you manage a well-run fleet, but how do you really know unless you have objective data to prove it? When you know your "numbers," you substantially increase the likelihood of successfully presenting the fleet position to the user departments, policy makers, and politicians. In addition, metrics help educate user departments having a financially adverse impact on fleet operations, and bring these inefficient practices to the attention of management in a non-accusatory format.

Read More →